Questioning What I Know About SEO and Link Building
Preface: This post is purely about search rankings — not traffic or conversions or anything — just how Google orders her results.
When I set up this blog, I decided I would try to make it rank for the term ‘link building blog’.
It wasn’t because it had a particularly high search volume or could be described as a ‘quick-win’, it was just because it’s a blog primarily about link building, so it made sense.
I just wanted to see where it ranked and try work out what was making it rank.
By seoMOZ’s Keyword Difficulty Tool, it was a relatively competitive term to go after:
Anyway, that didn’t really matter to me, I just wanted it to rank for what it was.
I’ve been pottering around the first page for about six months now, ranking from as high as 5 to as low as 11.
Then, all of a sudden, last week I jumped to 3 in the SERPs. (Which is where I am as I write this.)
If you look at seoMOZ’s ranking analysis of the first page, things really don’t add up:
(The columns are PA, Page Linking Root Domains, DA and Root Domain Link Root Domains — left to right.)
I know links are only part of the ranking factors, but c’mon, no one would put my blog third if they were just given these stats and asked to predict the SERPs.
Except for the exact match domain stats (ahem), my blog stands out like a sore thumb.
Link building strategy — or lack of
In the beginning all I did was add ‘link building blog’ to the meta-title.
I got a link from the company I work for and asked my friends who blog to link to me. All in all that added up to about 10 links — two of which are from sites that are actually relevant.
Over the past few months I’ve picked up a couple of links relatively ‘naturally’, but it’s child’s play compared to the other sites here.
(I actually spammed a couple of forums in the outset, got my fingers burnt and learnt an important lesson.)
It is impossible to justify or explain why I’m now ranking ahead of sites like Point Blank SEO, who tirelessly creates good content, guest posts on credible sites and creates a stir on sites like Twitter.
Case in point — this complete list of link building strategies.
In terms of link building, I’ve done barely any in comparison. Maybe I update my blog a bit more regularly than the other sites ranking, but there’s nothing really to signal to Google that this content is any good.
I’ve never guest posted, never done any broken link building, never created a tool or resource.
All I do is write the occasional blog post, once every 3 to 4 weeks.
They rarely get many readers or social bookmarks, or shares on Twitter. (Actually, my link building books post got a few shares, but nothing to write home about.)
Why then am I currently ranking #3 for ‘link building blog’ ahead of sites like Point Blank SEO, Ontolo and Link Spiel? I shouldn’t be anywhere near them.
Conclusion
Unfortunately, I can’t really conclude anything here. Would be more interested to hear other people’s thoughts.
Aside from keeping it relatively fresh and small mix of links, the rankings don’t really add up.
At the end of the day, this is just one term. It doesn’t prove anything about how anything does or doesn’t work.
I’ve certainly found it interesting to observe what’s been happening and it has made me question a lot of assumptions I took as standard in terms of what it takes to rank.
I think I read Paddy Moogan say something about the importance of testing and observing for yourself in SEO. I kinda know what he means now.
Anyway, I thought I’d put this story down in writing. It’s baffling and I hope you appreciate my honesty in this post.
To Jon from Point Blank SEO and the other link building blogs who are putting out better content than me and getting better links, I hope Google gets her act together — although it’s all in vain really, the term ‘link building blog’ sends f-all visitors.
Creative commons image by tsuihin — TimoStudios Flikr
Post By Michael Smith (31 Posts)
Michael works at 9xb Digital Agency in Harrogate, Monday to Friday. Click here to follow him on Twitter or have a look a his Google+ profile.
Last updated by Michael Smith at .











Hey Michael,
I think that you would have to do further research into this as to keyword spread and such as other sites may have huge numbers but may have a lot of keywords etc.
Phil
Philip Broadhead
Cheers Phil, yeah definitely need more research, wanted to see what other people say more than anything. Was a bit of a shoot from the hip post!
Michael Smith
Cool, keep it up I think this is the only SEO based blog I read LOL
Philip Broadhead
lol glad to hear it Phil
Michael Smith
Maybe all those other sites are really just spammers and Google is dishing out penalties? Poke around their link profile.
Or maybe you are just the 3rd best link building blog!
Emma
Haha, cheers Emma, definitely not the latter! My new strategy is ‘do very little’. Might have a hard time getting buy-in from clients though…
Michael Smith
I’d love to see your “Do Very Little” pitch to clients!
Emma
Did I mention that I love that you refer to Google as “her” — I always thought of it as “Le Google” (it sounds nice and reflective) but “La Google” could work as well! Will have to ask some French people.
Emma
Haha, I would like to know that too Emma. One thing I will say is that she’s a harsh mistress.
Michael Smith
Nah Emma, no chance of that…
I’m 100% convinced that it’s down to QDD (query deserves diversity)
Sean
lol great, the search engine equivalent of affirmative action…
Michael Smith
If it’s of any consolation, you’re currently in the #8 position for me.
Kevin
Scant consolation, Kevin — makes this post even more redundant than it was in the first place!
Michael Smith
I’m seeing you in second position now
Craig Addyman
You tease
Michael Smith